In a Test match, if a player happens to score a century in the first innings, then (85 %) his team won’t lose that game, and it has remained the same in last 5 years. On other hand, … Continue reading
Analysis
In a Test match, if a player happens to score a century in the first innings, then (85 %) his team won’t lose that game, and it has remained the same in last 5 years. On other hand, … Continue reading
What is a new ball mantra?. To compel batsman play every delivery!.
An opening batsman is responsible for building team’s platform, and at the start of an innings he is not aware how the pitch will behave, and how much the ball will swing. Adding to this, he is unaware of what tactics fielding side will employ, and how their opening bowlers will execute them.
Hence most opening batsmen will take some time to settle down. The time period is marginal, depending on different formats of game, adding pitch condition, and also character of a player.
So it becomes important for an opening bowler to make the best use of new ball, and make him play each delivery. If things are not going in his favor, and has tried all his tricks, he still needs to continue doing what he is doing, because even though a batsman will look comfortable, nevertheless forced to solve one problem after another at the start of an innings, which reduces the success rate of scoring runs, and increases possibility of a wicket.
[local /wp-content/uploads/2011/08/NBM.flv nolink]
List of bowlers opening the innings.
For India
| 2010 | Inns | Wkts | Avg | R/o | St.Rate | Ler x Lsr |
| Ishant | 25 | 56 | 29.39 | 3.59 | 29.39 | 105.79 |
| Zaheer | 20 | 53 | 22.52 | 3.22 | 42.34 | 136.30 |
| Praveen | 11 | 27 | 25.59 | 2.58 | 59.40 | 153.56 |
| Sreesanth | 15 | 18 | 58 | 3.91 | 89.40 | 349.49 |
| Mithun | 6 | 6 | 62 | 4.04 | 92.00 | 368.00 |
List of bowlers opening the innings.
For all countries
| Player | Inns | Wkts | Avg | St.Rate | R/o | Ler x Lsr |
| J Anderson | 34 | 86 | 23.36 | 49.75 | 2.81 | 140.16 |
| D Steyn | 21 | 62 | 21.43 | 40.36 | 3.18 | 128.61 |
| I Sharma | 25 | 56 | 29.39 | 49.12 | 3.58 | 176.35 |
| Z Khan | 20 | 53 | 22.71 | 42.46 | 3.20 | 136.30 |
| M Morkel | 22 | 52 | 25.21 | 49.75 | 3.04 | 151.26 |
| S Broad | 25 | 41 | 30.22 | 61.65 | 2.94 | 181.31 |
| M Amir | 13 | 33 | 22.33 | 45.72 | 2.93 | 134 |
| M Asif | 15 | 33 | 27.36 | 55.10 | 2.97 | 164.18 |
| D Bollinger | 15 | 30 | 27.16 | 47.5 | 3.43 | 163 |
| C Tremlett | 12 | 29 | 25.62 | 49.09 | 3.13 | 153.72 |
A look at India’s opening bowling spell during the ongoing Pataudi series.
1st Test Match, England(1st Innings)
Zaheer Khan and Praveen Kumar opened the bowling, and their spell lasted 14overs(84 balls). England were 23-1. Below is how English openers batted those 14overs.
| Strauss | Indictors | Cook |
| 8 | Runs | 12 |
| 46 | Balls faced | 36 |
| 5 | Singles | 1 |
| 1 | Boundaries | 1 |
| 6 | Maidens | 6 |
| 7 | Scoring shots | 5 |
England(2nd Innings)
Due to injury to Zaheer Khan, Praveen Kumar & Ishant Sharma opened the bowling for India, and their spell lasted 16overs(96balls). England were 34-1. Below is how English openers started their reply after taking a lead of 188runs.
| Strauss | Indictors | Cook |
| 23 | Runs | 1 |
| 52 | Balls faced | 27 |
| 4 | Singles | 1 |
| 3 | Boundaries | 0 |
| 3 | Maidens | 3 |
| 11 | Scoring shots | 1 |
2nd Test Match, England(1st Innings)
Once again India chose to field after winning the toss, and they opened the bowling with Praveen Kumar and Ishant Sharma. Their spell lasted 10overs (60 balls), and England were struggling at 18-1. Below is how it all started.
| Strauss | Indictors | Cook |
| 8 | Runs | 2 |
| 30 | Balls faced | 16 |
| 2 | Singles | 2 |
| 1 | Boundaries | 1 |
| 3 | Maidens | 3 |
| 4 | Scoring shots | 2 |
England(2nd Innings)
India were ahead when England batted again, taking a lead of 67Runs. Once again they opened the bowling with Praveen Kumar and Ishant Sharma, but this they had a short spell of 6overs(36balls). England were 16-1.
| Strauss | Indictors | Cook |
| 3 | Runs | 5 |
| 20 | Balls faced | 11 |
| 3 | Singles | 1 |
| 0 | Boundaries | 1 |
| 2 | Maidens | 0 |
| 3 | Scoring shots | 2 |
3rd Test Match, England(1st Innings)
India batted first, and were bundled out for 224, and made a change to their bowling line up. They employed Sreesanth to open the bowling with Praveen Kumar. Their spell lasted 7overs.
England were comfortably placed at 24-0 after 7overs.
| Strauss | Indictors | Cook |
| 19 | Runs | 5 |
| 24 | Balls faced | 18 |
| 0 | Singles | 1 |
| 4 | Boundaries | 0 |
| 3 | Maidens | 3 |
| 7 | Scoring shots | 3 |
Data processed from Jan 2010 till end of England(1st Inn) 3rd Test, Aug 2011.
Indian players should play like athletes, and play like a cricketers, not look for personal glory, and milestones achievers should not be encouraged by their captain. Team India should now take this series as a 2-Test battle, with no draw … Continue reading
Trent Bridge Review
[local /wp-content/uploads/2011/07/2nd-test-review-Trent-Bridge.flv nolink]
This season in English County, every 2nd game teams manage to score 400!.
18 Teams play 138 games in Two Division in English County.
This season, at the end of 88 games, 54 times teams manage to go past the 400 score, which is about every second game a total of 400 is scored by a Team.
An excellent opportunity for Indian Team!!
…….neverthless 22 times teams were forced to follow-on, which works up to 25%, not a good sign for Indians.
Major Partnership density is in middle order (56 %)
Earlier in July, game between Nottinghamshire v Somerset could be a confidence factor for India!.
Lord’s. A Complete Analysis
[local /wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Lords-Preview.flv nolink]
India were let down by their batsmen!
Lord’s Batting Partnerships for India
Lord’s Batting Partnerships for England
India’s Batting partnership since 2004
(Consistent at top, neverthless tapers towards the end)
What is a job of a top order batsman when he is batting with lower order/tail?.
1- If they are batting first, then look to score as many runs as possible with a better strike rate.
2- If they are replying a 1st Inning score, then make sure they come as close as possible(after avoiding follow on) to that score, by building partnerships with tail, and have a strike rate at which his partner(lower/tail) is comfortable with (some tail-enders like to be scoreless and stick around as long as they can, some like to hit boundaries every second ball).
Neverthless Rahul Dravid’s innings had value in terms of personal landmark, and averting follow on, but could he along with lower order posted substantial partnerships, and come much closer to England’s 1st inn score ?.
Lately Dravid has been involved with lower order partnerships, yet India couldn’t reach 400 or even 300, so is it possible for him to change his batting style, and bat faster ?
If that happens, then partnerships can be build.
Here one is not suggesting 50 or 100 runs, but partnerships of 30s,/40s can be substantial runs for teams.
India’s current line-up is blessed with excellent lower order strikers, and they have enough experience batting with top batsmen.
Here one feels Dravid should change his batting style, and once that happens, the fielding side will become defensive, and instead of attacking to pick wickets, they would try and stop runs, which will allow Dravid to build partnerships with lower order, and India can score decent total consistently.
Here is a look at Dravid’s involvement in partnerships with lower order batsmen in Test cricket.
Rahul Dravid’s Partnerships with lower order batsmen(All Tests)
| Stand | Inns | Runs | 50+ | 100+ | Avg |
| 6th Wkt | 42 | 1855 | 12 | 3 | 46.38 |
| 7th Wkt | 29 | 638 | 3 | 0 | 22.79 |
| 8th Wkt | 20 | 578 | 1 | 2 | 30.42 |
| 9th Wkt | 15 | 371 | 4 | 24.73 | |
| 10th Wkt | 8 | 37 | 4.63 |
Now, if one has to sum up all these partnerships (add all lower order partnerships), then Dravid’s involvement with tail fetched India @23 Runs/Wkt.
… If one has to compare this analysis with Ricky Ponting, his contemporary Test No .3 batsman, then his involvement with tail has fetched Australia 42 Runs/Wkt.
Ricky Ponting’s Partnerships with lower order batsmen (Batting Position No.3,since 2001)
| Stand | Inns | Runs | 50+ | 100+ | Avg |
| 6th Wkt | 34 | 1354 | 9 | 2 | 43.68 |
| 7th Wkt | 22 | 585 | 2 | 1 | 29.25 |
| 8th Wkt | 14 | 636 | 5 | 1 | 48.92 |
| 9th Wkt | 8 | 60 | 7.50 | ||
| 10th Wkt | 5 | 51 | 10.20 |
They both have different batting style, and there is nothing much in terms of average (unless one can measure strike rate of each partnerships) neverthless Dravid can take a leaf from this Aussie.
1st Test Match
Place : Lord’s, London
Toss : India, chose to field.
Result : England won by 196 Runs.
Award : Kevin Pietersen
England |
Dismissal |
Runs |
Balls |
SS |
4.6s |
Begin |
End |
Session wise |
Strauss(2-62)24.4 |
C Ishant b Zaheer |
22 |
83 |
15 |
2.0 |
0 |
62 |
20-2-0 |
Cook(1-19)11 |
Lbw Zaheer |
12 |
36 |
5 |
1.0 |
0 |
19 |
12-0-0 |
Trott(3-160)61.2 |
Lbw Kumar |
70 |
140 |
36 |
9.0 |
19 |
160 |
21-47-0 |
Pietersen |
Not out |
202 |
326 |
106 |
21.1 |
62 |
474 |
49-66-87 |
Bell(4-270)92.1 |
c Dhoni b Kumar |
45 |
76 |
24 |
6.0 |
160 |
270 |
27-18-0 |
Morgan(5-270)92.4 |
c Dhoni b Kumar |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0.0 |
270 |
270 |
0-0-0 |
Prior(6-390)120.3 |
c Dhoni b Kumar |
71 |
93 |
38 |
7.0 |
270 |
390 |
0-21-50 |
Broad(7-390)120.4 |
Lbw kumar |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
390 |
390 |
0-0-0 |
Swann(8-451)129.4 |
b Raina |
24 |
28 |
11 |
3.0 |
390 |
451 |
0-0-24 |
Tremlett |
Not out |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1.0 |
451 |
474 |
0-0-4 |
Anderson |
Dnb |
|||||||
Extras (24) |
B 14, LB 8, NB1, W1 |
Team Score: 474-8decl. (131.4)overs |
||||||
Scoring shots(236) |
1s 136, 2s 41, 3s 6, 4s 52, 6s 1 |
Session wise: Day1 (43-84-dnb) -Day2 (90-90-169) |
||||||
India |
Overs |
Mdn |
Runs |
Wkts |
NB.W |
SS |
4.6 |
L 3(%) |
C 3(%) |
Zaheer |
13.3 |
8 |
18 |
2 |
9 |
2.0 |
75.19 |
45.11 |
|
PKumar |
40.3 |
10 |
106 |
5 |
50 |
15.0 |
59.5 |
32.26 |
|
Ishant |
32 |
5 |
128 |
0 |
0.1 |
65 |
16.0 |
50.00 |
18.75 |
Harbhajan |
35 |
3 |
152 |
0 |
89 |
14.0 |
54.29 |
31.43 |
|
Dhoni |
8 |
1 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
2.0 |
62.50 |
25.00 |
Raina |
2.4 |
1 |
25 |
1 |
8 |
3.1 |
41.67 |
0.00 |
|
Byes |
14 |
0 |
|||||||
Leg byes |
8 |
0 |
|||||||
Total |
131.4 |
28 |
474 |
8 |
1.1 |
236 |
52.1 |
57.07% |
22.83% |
India |
Dismissal |
Runs |
Balls |
SS |
4.6s |
Begin |
End |
Session wise |
A Mukund(2-77)24.4 |
b Broad |
49 |
88 |
23 |
5.0 |
0 |
77 |
41-0-8 |
G Gambhir(1-63)18.2 |
b Broad |
15 |
46 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
63 |
8-0-7 |
R Dravid |
Not out |
103 |
220 |
53 |
15 |
63 |
286 |
15-45-44 |
S Tendulkar(3-158) 43.4 |
c Swann b Broad |
34 |
58 |
11 |
6 |
77 |
158 |
10-24-0 |
V Laxman(4-182) 55.5 |
c Trott b Tremlett |
10 |
36 |
4 |
2 |
158 |
182 |
0-10-0 |
S Raina(5-183) 56.2 |
Lbw Swann |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
182 |
183 |
0-0-0 |
M Dhoni(6-240) 83.4 |
c Swann b Tremlett |
28 |
103 |
19 |
2 |
183 |
240 |
0-4-0 |
Harbhajan(7-241) 83.5 |
c Prior b Tremlett |
0 |
2 |
0 |
240 |
241 |
0-0-0 |
|
P Kumar(8-276) 89 |
c Strauss b Broad |
17 |
13 |
8 |
2 |
241 |
276 |
0-0-17 |
Zaheer(9-284)91.5 |
b Anderson |
0 |
7 |
0 |
276 |
284 |
0-0-0 |
|
Ishant Sharma(10-286)95.5 |
c Prior b Anderson |
0 |
12 |
0 |
284 |
286 |
0-0-0 |
|
Extras (30) |
B 5, LB 12, NB12, W1 |
Team Score: 286 all out (95.5)overs |
||||||
Scoring shots(126) |
1s 69, 2s 20, 3s 3, 4s 34 |
Session wise: Day2 (dnb-dnb-17) –Day3 (85-91-93) |
||||||
Eng |
Ovr |
Mdn |
Runs |
Wkts |
NB.W |
SS |
4.6 |
L3(%) |
C3(%) |
Anderson |
23.5 |
6 |
87 |
2 |
36 |
13.0 |
51.06 |
25.53 |
|
Tremlett |
24 |
5 |
80 |
3 |
10.0 |
34 |
9.0 |
58.33 |
25 |
Broad |
22 |
8 |
37 |
4 |
2.1 |
18 |
4 |
72.73 |
50 |
Trott |
6 |
1 |
12 |
|
8 |
1 |
100 |
50 |
|
Swann |
19 |
3 |
50 |
1 |
27 |
7 |
57.89 |
26.32 |
|
Pietersen |
1 |
0 |
3 |
|
3 |
100 |
0 |
||
Byes |
14 |
0 |
|||||||
Leg byes |
8 |
0 |
|||||||
Total |
95.5 |
23 |
286 |
10 |
12.1 |
126 |
34.0 |
61.78 |
41.88 |
England |
Dismissal |
Runs |
Balls |
SS |
4.6s |
Begin |
End |
Session wise |
Strauss(2-54)22.3 |
LBW Harbhajan |
32 |
70 |
16 |
4 |
0 |
54 |
29-0-3 |
Cook(1-23)11 |
c Dhoni b P Kumar |
1 |
27 |
1 |
0 |
23 |
1-0-0 |
|
Trott(5-62)27.4 |
b Ishant |
22 |
55 |
13 |
2 |
23 |
62 |
22-0-0 |
Pietersen(3-55)23.1 |
c Dhoni b I Sharma |
1 |
3 |
1 |
54 |
55 |
1-0-0 |
|
Bell(4-55)24 |
c Dhoni b I Sharma |
0 |
5 |
0 |
55 |
55 |
0-0-0 |
|
Morgan(6-107)43.2 |
c Gambhir b I Sharma |
19 |
56 |
10 |
1 |
55 |
107 |
5-14-0 |
Prior |
Not out |
103* |
120 |
62 |
5.1 |
62 |
269 |
5-50-53 |
Broad |
Not out |
74* |
90 |
39 |
9.0 |
107 |
269 |
0-36-38 |
Swann, Tremlett, Anderson |
|
|
||||||
Extras (17) |
B 7, LB 8, NB 0, W2 |
Team Score: 269-6decl. (71)overs |
||||||
Scoring shots(142) |
1s 87, 2s 24, 3s 9, 4s 21, 6s 1 |
Session wise: Day3(0-0-5)Day 4 (67-102-95) |
||||||
India |
Ovr |
Mdn |
Runs |
Wkt |
NB.W |
SS |
4.6 |
L3(%) |
C 3(%) |
PKumar |
20 |
2 |
70 |
1 |
0.1 |
33 |
7 |
55.00 |
35.00 |
Ishant |
22 |
6 |
59 |
4 |
0.1 |
35 |
4 |
63.64 |
50.00 |
Harbhajan |
21 |
1 |
66 |
1 |
44 |
4 |
57.14 |
23.81 |
|
Raina |
6 |
1 |
43 |
|
22 |
4.1 |
33.33 |
16.67 |
|
Dhoni |
2 |
16 |
|
8 |
2 |
|
|
||
Byes |
7 |
|
|||||||
Leg byes |
8 |
|
|||||||
Total |
71 |
10 |
269 |
6 |
0.2 |
142 |
21.1 |
54.93 |
33.80 |
India |
Dismissal |
Runs |
Balls |
SS |
4.6s |
Begin |
End |
Session wise |
A Mukund(1-19)8.3 |
b Broad |
12 |
32 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
19 |
0-0-19 |
R Dravid(2-94)34.1 |
c Prior b Anderson |
36 |
93 |
18 |
5 |
0 |
94 |
2-0-34 |
V Laxman(3-131)48.1 |
c Bell b Anderson |
56 |
113 |
29 |
8 |
19 |
131 |
24-0-32 |
G Gambhir(4-135)49.2 |
lbw Swann |
22 |
56 |
12 |
3 |
94 |
135 |
22-0-0 |
S Tendulkar(5-165)67 |
lbw Anderson |
12 |
68 |
7 |
1 |
131 |
165 |
7-5-0 |
S Raina(9-260)95.4 |
c Prior b Anderson |
78 |
136 |
35 |
10 |
135 |
260 |
4-50-24 |
M Dhoni(6-225)85.2 |
c Prior b Tremlett |
16 |
49 |
10 |
2 |
165 |
225 |
0-16-0 |
Harbhajan(7-243)91.5 |
c Tremlett b Anderson |
12 |
24 |
5 |
2 |
225 |
243 |
0-0-12 |
P Kumar(8-256)95 |
b Broad |
2 |
9 |
2 |
243 |
256 |
0-0-2 |
|
Zaheer |
Not out |
0 |
1 |
0 |
256 |
261 |
0-0-0 |
|
Ishant Sharma(10-261)96.3 |
lbw Broad |
1 |
4 |
1 |
260 |
261 |
0-0-1 |
|
Extras (14) |
B 2, LB 6, NB6 |
Team Score: 261 all out (96.3)overs |
||||||
Scoring shots(125) |
1s 70, 2s 20, 3s 3, 4s 32 |
Session wise: Day4(0-0-80)Day5(62-76-43) |
||||||
Eng |
Ovr |
Mdn |
Runs |
Wkts |
NB.W |
SS |
4.6 |
L3(%) |
C3(%) |
Anderson |
28 |
7 |
65 |
5 |
35 |
7 |
64.29 |
35.71 |
|
Tremlett |
21 |
4 |
44 |
1 |
6.0 |
18 |
6 |
80.95 |
52.38 |
Broad |
20.3 |
4 |
57 |
3 |
26 |
9 |
59.11 |
14.78 |
|
Swann |
22 |
3 |
64 |
1 |
35 |
7 |
59.09 |
31.82 |
|
Trott |
2 |
11 |
|
4 |
2 |
50.00 |
0.00 |
||
Pietersen |
3 |
12 |
|
7 |
1 |
33.33 |
0.00 |
||
Byes |
2 |
|
|||||||
Leg byes |
6 |
|
|||||||
Total |
96.3 |
18 |
261 |
10 |
6.00 |
125 |
32 |
64.38 |
43.61 |
Since the beginning of Test Cricket, Day 3 always produced substantial runs for teams, during this period the game evolves into an interesting situation… India Preview Test Ranking. From 2009, in 24 Tests India have won 12, & lost just … Continue reading
Since 2009, India 1st Inn Avg Score is 469 Runs while batting second in a Test match. In these 15 Test matches, 10 times India scored more than 400 Runs.
List of 1st Inn score (batting second) since 2009.
| Date | Venue | Vs | Score | Result |
| March 2009 | Hamilton | New Zealand | 520 all out | W |
| March 2009 | Napier | New Zealand | 305 all out | D |
| Dec 2009 | Mumbai | Sri Lanka | 726/9 | W |
| Jan 2010 | Dhaka | bangladesh | 544/ 8 | W |
| Feb 2010 | Nagpur | South Africa | 233 all out | L |
| Feb 2010 | Kolkata | South Africa | 643 /6 | W |
| July 2010 | Galle | Sri Lanka | 276 all out | L |
| July 2010 | SSC | Sri Lanka | 707 all out | D |
| Aug 2010 | Colombo | Sri Lanka | 436 all out | W |
| Oct 2010 | Mohali | Australia | 405 all out | W |
| Oct 2010 | Bangalore | Australia | 495 all out | W |
| Dec 2010 | Hyderabad | New Zealand | 472 all out | D |
| Dec 2010 | Nagpur | New Zealand | 566/ 8 | W |
| Jan 2011 | Cape Town | South Africa | 364 all out | D |
| July 2011 | Dominica | West Indies | 347 all out | D |
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Test Ranking. Currently India is at No.1 with 125 points, and England is at No.3 with 117 points, a point behind 2nd ranked South Africa. If England wants to become the No.1 Test side, then they just have to win … Continue reading
In last 2 years( 25 Test matches), England’s Avg 1st Inn score is 397, & a score of 350 or more have been achieved regularly(17 times) by them, and so far they haven’t lost a single game with that score. … Continue reading
List of Batting -Partnership since 2009. Wkt Inns Avg (100+)Partnership I 40 40.38 4 II 40 49.7 7 III 37 53.86 7 IV 36 43.67 6 V 36 49.25 5 VI 36 51.16 8 VII 31 24.3 1 VIII … Continue reading
[local /wp-content/uploads/2011/07/2011-India-in-West-Indies.-A-Test-Review.flv nolink]
India beat West Indies (1-0) in 3 Test series, and winning their 2nd consecutive series against West Indies.
India’s Key Performers
Rahul Dravid In every inning he came in to bat inside the 10th over, & thrice in his presence team almost scored 100 runs, yet it didn’t allow India to reach 300 once. If Dravid can play a bit faster, at least 1 scoring shot in less than 4 balls, & bat long enough, then Mr. Consistent can be more productive.
VVS Laxman Like Rahul he too came into bat when India were in trouble, but his contribution as a batsman and as a player was far more than Dravids.
In last 2 test matches his scoring rate was much better than his strike rate, as he was able to rotate the strike ( last 2 Test matches featured 60 % singles/ 25 +singles/100 balls). If Laxman, like Dravid play more aggressively then India’s lower order can be far more effective than other nation.
Suresh Raina Considering that he came into Test series with a very poor ODI series, this was an excellent performance, truly coming of age for this young batsman.
His performance marked the making of a Test player. Involved in most 100 partnerships(3), and he always performed when team where in trouble. His excellent scoring rate (3.43) allowed those partnerships to grow.
Praveen Kumar Accurate and effective, without bowling a single error ball (no ball & wide).
Ishant Sharma Making an excellent comeback to Test cricket. Consistent pace and accuracy was the key factor in his bowling. His accuracy fetched him 10 straight ball dismissal, adding to this 54% of victims were in single figure!.
India Batting (6 Inns) : Runs 1409
(Primary Indicator)
| Batsmen | Inns | Runs | H.S | 50s/100s | P’rtnrsh’ps
(50+) |
Avg | Balls/Scoring shots | (4/6s)
Scoring shots |
| Dravid
(496)* |
6 | 251 | 112 | 1-1 | 5 | 50.20 | 4.19 | 3.63 |
| Laxman(257)* | 6 | 243 | 87 | 3 | 5 | 48.60 | 3.43 | 4.92 |
| SK Raina | 6 | 232 | 82 | 3 | 3 | 46.40 | 3.36 | 6.83 |
| A Mukund | 6 | 147 | 62 | 1 | 3 | 24.50 | 4.45 | 4.21 |
| Harbhajan(56)* | 5 | 98 | 70 | 1 | 1 | 24.50 | 3.28 | 8 |
| M Dhoni(168)* | 5 | 97 | 74 | 1 | 1 | 19.40 | 3.06 | 3.37 |
| V Kohli | 5 | 76 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 15.20 | 4.91 | 3.09 |
| M Vijay | 6 | 72 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 12.00 | 4.50 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 1409 | 112 | 10.1 | 16 | 28.76 | 3.74 | 4.85 |
*Runs scored in last series v West Indies (2006)
Secondary Indicator
| Batsmen | Inns | St.Rate | (1s)
Scoring shots |
4s (%) | 1s (%) | Value /Inn | Batsmen@crease
(Avg Team Runs) |
| Dravid | 6 | 39.65 | 16.1 | 37.45 | 40.63 | 1.46 | 92 |
| Laxman | 6 | 47.83 | 20.27 | 41.15 | 42.38 | 1.39 | 89 |
| SK Raina | 6 | 54. | 18.86 | 50 | 34.5 | 1.50 | 83 |
| A Mukund | 6 | 41.29 | 12.64 | 40.81 | 30.61 | 0.72 | 49 |
| Harbhajan | 5 | 60.86 | 18 | 55.10 | 29.59 | 0.75 | 46 |
| M Dhoni | 5 | 54.49 | 20.22 | 26.80 | 37.11 | 0.60 | 41 |
| V Kohli | 5 | 33.62 | 14.15 | 39.47 | 42.10 | 0.44 | 36 |
| M Vijay | 6 | 36.36 | 14.64 | 33.33 | 40.27 | 0.42 | 28 |
| Total | 6 | 50.39 | 17.18 | 39.32 | 34.14 |
Method of Dismissals
| Batsmen | LBW | Bowled | RO | CB | Wicket – keeper | St |
| Openers | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Middle Order
(III-IV-V) |
1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | ||
| Lower Order
(VI-VII-VIII) |
2 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
(Lower scores dismissals)
| Dismissed under-10 Runs | L B W | Bowled | R O | C B | Wicket -keeper |
| Openers | 2 | 2 | |||
| Middle Order (III-IV-V) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| Lower Order (VI-VII-VIII) | 1 | ||||
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
India Bowling ( 6 Inns) Wickets : 57
(Primary Indicator)
| Bowlers | Inns | Overs | Runs | Wkt | Best | 4/5/10 | Avg | St.Rate | LER x LSR |
| I Sharma | 6 | 123.5 | 371 | 22 | 6-55 | 1-2-1 | 16.86 | 33.70 | 100.76 |
| P Kumar | 6 | 110 | 254 | 12 | 3-38 | 21.16 | 55 | 126.5 | |
| Harbhajan(11)* | 6 | 125 | 279 | 11 | 4-75 | 1.0.0 | 24.50 | 68 | 151.64 |
| A Mishra | 2 | 26.5 | 113 | 4 | 2-51 | 28.25 | 40 | 168.4 | |
| S Raina | 4 | 29.5 | 59 | 3 | 2-32 | 19.66 | 59.60 | 117.41 | |
| A Mithun | 2 | 28 | 84 | 3 | 2-34 | 28 | 56 | 168 | |
| M Patel(14)* | 2 | 44 | 119 | 1 | 1-48 | 119 | 264 | 712.8 | |
| Total | 6 | 489.1 | 1353 | 57 | 6-55 | 2.2.1 | 23.73 | 51.49 | 142.73 |
*Runs scored in last series v West Indies (2006)
(Secondary Indicator)
| Bowlers | Inns | R/O | Error(%) | Balls/Scoring shots | (4/6s)
Scoring shots |
(1s)
Scoring shots |
| I Sharma | 6 | 2.99 | 0.94 | 3.97 | 5.24 | 14.26 |
| P Kumar | 6 | 2.30 | 0 | 4.96 | 3.78 | 10.60 |
| Harbhajan | 6 | 2.23 | 0 | 4.90 | 3.73 | 13.60 |
| A Mishra | 2 | 4.21 | 3.10 | 3.35 | 9.93 | 17.39 |
| S Raina | 4 | 1.97 | 0 | 3.97 | 1.67 | 21.22 |
| A Mithun | 2 | 3 | 2.97 | 4.94 | 6.54 | 9.52 |
| M Patel | 2 | 2.70 | 0.37 | 4.47 | 5.68 | 12.12 |
| Total | 6 | 2.77 | 0.74 | 4.41 | 4.73 | 13.42 |
(Method of Dismissals)
| Bowlers | L B W | Bowled | Slip(ct) | Wicket -Keeper | Low score (u-10) |
| I Sharma | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| P Kumar | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Harbhajan | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| A Mishra | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||
| S Raina | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| A Mithun | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| M Patel | 1 | ||||
| Total | 8 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 27 |
West Indies Key Performers
Darren Sammy : Excellent performance, both as a leader and as a player. His captaincy will only get better provided he can be given more time and games to lead in all format (at least ODI & Tests)
Openers : West Indies opener provided the only 50 runs stand for the 1st wicket in this series (Indian opener failed, avg 9.16). They need to back themselves while playing aggressively. With more opportunities
West Indies selectors need to give more opportunity(at least 3 to 4 Test series) to these selected openers. Barath & Simmons are technically sound openers, and they can be the answer to their Batting problem.
Darren Bravo : Bats very similar to Chanderpaul, slow and steadily building partnerships.
Samuels & Chanderpaul : Their experience can be handy for West Indies in near future, and if they are able to play a little faster, than it is possible for team to score 300 consistently, and give themselves enough opportunity to win Test matches….which has been a rarity for them.
Fidel Edwards : Expensive but effective, and if turns consistent than he can be very lethal.
Ravi Rampaul : Excellent performance, especially with the new ball. It is very difficult for one to remember a West Indian genuinely swing a ball, as one associates seam and bounce from Caribbean bowlers. Rampaul has the ability to control his swing.
Devendra Bishoo : It’s a rarity that a rookie leg spinners is level headed, in-expensive, yet productive. Troubled experienced batsmen with his basic leg spinning ball.
West Indies batting (6 Inns): 1353 Runs
(Primary Indicator)
| Batsmen | Inns | Runs | H.S | 50s/100s | P’rtnrsh’ps
(50+) |
Avg | Balls/Scoring shots | (4/6s)
Scoring shots |
| Chanderpaul(301)* | 6 | 241 | 116* | 0.1 | 5 | 48.20 | 4.79 | 1.72 |
| D Bravo | 6 | 205 | 73 | 2 | 5 | 34.16 | 4.84 | 5.25 |
| A Barath | 5 | 150 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 25.00 | 5.24 | 5.34 |
| C Baugh | 6 | 145 | 60 | 1 | 2 | 29.00 | 3.04 | 8.45 |
| K Edwards | 2 | 116 | 110 | 0.1 | 1 | 58.00 | 3.20 | 4.46 |
| M Samuels(114)* | 4 | 96 | 78* | 1 | 1 | 32 | 4.71 | 5.53 |
| D Sammy | 6 | 78 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 13.00 | 3.34 | 9.40 |
| L Simmons | 4 | 46 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 11.50 | 4.77 | 8.14 |
| R Sarwan(257)* | 4 | 29 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 7.25 | 5.18 | 3.61 |
| Total | 6 | 1353 | 116* | 5.2 | 8 | 23.74 | 4.41 | 4.22 |
(Secondary indicator)
| Batsmen | Inns | St. Rate | (1s)
Scoring shots |
4s (%) | 1s (%) | Value /Inn | Batsmen@crease
(Avg Team Runs) |
| Chanderpaul | 6 | 32 | 14.21 | 21.57 | 44.39 | 1.59 | 100 |
| D Bravo | 6 | 39.88 | 12.26 | 52.68 | 30.73 | 1.42 | 85 |
| A Barath | 5 | 50.33 | 8.77 | 53.57 | 20.53 | 1.11 | 37 |
| C Baugh | 6 | 68.07 | 18.31 | 53.79 | 26.89 | 1.09 | 42 |
| K Edwards | 2 | 51.78 | 21.43 | 36.20 | 41.37 | 1.86 | 106 |
| M Samuels | 4 | 44.23 | 11.52 | 51.04 | 26.04 | 1.21 | 43 |
| D Sammy | 6 | 51.78 | 18.80 | 66.66 | 28.20 | 0.55 | 25 |
| L Simmons | 4 | 53.48 | 8.14 | 65.21 | 15.21 | 0.45 | 31 |
| R Sarwan | 4 | 34.93 | 10.84 | 41.37 | 31.04 | 0.35 | 20 |
| Total | 6 | 46.10 | 13.42 | 43.39 | 29.12 |
Method of Dismissals
| Batsmen | L B W | Bowled | R O | C B | Wicket -keeper |
| Openers | 2 | 2 | |||
| Middle Order (III-IV-V) | 3 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Lower Order (VI-VII-VIII) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
(Lower scores dismissals)
| Dismissed under-10 Runs | L B W | Bowled | R O | C B | Wicket -keeper |
| Openers | 0 | ||||
| Middle Order (III-IV-V) | 1 | 2 | |||
| Lower Order (VI-VII-VIII) | 4 | 2 | |||
| Total | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
West Indies Bowling ( 6 Inns) Wickets : 57
(Primary Indicator)
| Bowlers | Inns | Overs | Runs | Wkt | Best | 4/5 | Avg | St.Rate | LER x LSR |
| F Edwards(2)* | 6 | 114.2 | 380 | 19 | 5-76 | 2 | 20 | 36.1 | 119.85 |
| R Rampaul | 6 | 95.2 | 249 | 10 | 3-38 | 24.90 | 57.20 | 149.29 | |
| D Bishoo | 6 | 122.5 | 391 | 12 | 4-65 | 1-0 | 32.58 | 61.4 | 195.25 |
| D Sammy | 6 | 116 | 268 | 7 | 4-52 | 1.0 | 38.28 | 99.4 | 229.61 |
| Chanderpaul | 6 | 10 | 38 | 1 | 1-38 | 38 | 60 | 228.00 | |
| Total | 6 | 466.3 | 1409 | 49 | 5-76 | 2.2 | 28.75 | 57.12 | 172.75 |
*Wkts taken in last series v India (2006)
(Secondary Indicator)
| Bowlers | Inns | R/O | Error(%) | Balls/Scoring shots | (4/6s)
Scoring shots |
(1s)
Scoring shots |
| F Edwards | 6 | 3.32 | 4.08 | 3.79 | 5.39 | 15.16 |
| R Rampaul | 6 | 2.61 | 0.87 | 4.43 | 5.59 | 14.14 |
| D Bishoo | 6 | 3.18 | 1.62 | 3.23 | 4.88 | 21.57 |
| D Sammy | 6 | 2.31 | 0.14 | 4.49 | 3.73 | 13.93 |
| Chanderpaul | 6 | 3.80 | 0 | 2.30 | 3.33 | 30 |
| Total | 6 | 3.02 | 2.17 | 3.74 | 4.85 | 17.18 |
Method of Dismissals
| Bowlers | LBW | Bowled | Slip(ct) | Wk-Keeper | St | C B | Low score (u-10) |
| Edwards | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 10 | |
| Rampaul | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Bishoo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Sammy | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Chanderpaul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 22 |